I’m very proud of the Healthcare 100, because I think it has helped a lot of people (bloggers and non-bloggers alike) discover valuable new sources of information about health and medicine, healthcare policy, and other important issues.
I also think our ranking algorithm works pretty well. When we have issues with a blog’s place in the rankings, as we sometimes do, it’s usually not the fault of the algorithm; the problem is that, in attempting to attain up-to-date data from Technorati, Bloglines, and Google, we sometimes hit a snag. Often, it’s a problem on their end — not ours. Nonetheless, this sometimes results in rankings that we must go back and manually correct.
Such has been the case recently with Medgadget and Pharma Giles. In the first instance, the Medgadget folks sent an e-mail pointing out to us that their blog had fallen to #16 in the rankings, which seemed low to them. They were right; we were getting incorrect data from Technorati. Now, they’re back at #3 where they belong.
Pharma Giles, meanwhile, was pleasantly surprised to see that it ranked #30 on the Healthcare 100 on Friday. We were, too, since the Technorati and Bloglines scores looked high to us. We checked it out and they were high. So, for the moment, Pharma Giles is out of the top 100, but we’re sure they’ll be back soon.
We’ll keep working to keep the inaccuracies to a minimum — and you can help by dropping us a line if you come across anything that seems off to you.