View All     Post Message

Hot Topics Categories

Aging

Alternative Medicine

Big Pharma

Children's Health

Consumer Products and Services

Diseases and Conditions

Drug Talk

eDrugSearch.com Testimonials

Everything Else

Food and Drug Administration

Health 2.0

Health Insurance

Healthcare100

Humor

Inspirational

Introduce Yourself

Medications

Men's Health

News and Media

Pharmacy Talk

Public Health and Safety

Religion and Spirituality

Reproductive Health

Senior Health

Suggest a Category

Using eDrugSearch.com

Weight Loss Tips and Issues

Women's Health


Big Pharma > Is Testing Sufficient

  Posted By

June 22, 2008, 2:53 pm
Flag as Inappropriate
BabeRuth  

  Subject

Is Testing Sufficient 

  

Time after time we read of drugs being recalled, vaccines being taken out of circulation (rotavirus) and these are drugs that have been tested and are supposedly safe.

What's going wrong with the testing of these drugs? Why are dangerous meds getting through? 

Comments

 

June 22, 2008, 4:00 pm
Flag as Inappropriate
DianaR says...

  

First:
No one knows exactly how a drug will behave once it is in the body, especially without using animals for testing. Even though there are other ways to test, they may not produce the same results or the spectrum of information that animal testing once did.

Second:

Pharmaceutical companies have to release drugs to pay for the research performed, and the development of new drugs. The pressure to generate revenue is pretty high and can lead to drugs that MAY have side issues being released to the public, hoping that ht suspected problems don't actually develop.

 

 

June 22, 2008, 4:55 pm
Flag as Inappropriate
2Ronnies says...

  

First; that is why drugs should be tested first small scale, then on increasing numbers to make sure that they are safe before being released to millions of the general population.

Second; pharmaceutical companies make millions in profits each year that could be used to fund the research for new drugs until they are bringing their own revenue. There is no need to guinea pig a poorly tested drug on the public just to make a buck. There is no excuse for killing people for profit.

Drugs are poorly tested, and there is no excuse. What is worse is that the FDA allows this to happen. 

 

June 22, 2008, 5:03 pm
Flag as Inappropriate
STP_champ says...

  

Diana, drugs are still tested on animals. Things like cosmetics are not, unless it's something new. But drugs still go through animal trials and then human trials. The problem is humans are a broad spectrum and long-term reactions are not studied. Releasing a drug because you need to pay for it is ridiculous and unethical. These are humans with lives that are being used as a big sample group. Companies that release drugs that aren't well tested deserve the class action suits. 

 

June 22, 2008, 9:25 pm
Flag as Inappropriate
Simplyme says...

  

You know releasing these drugs to only then find out the adverse affects are ridiculous. And as far as the trials there are plenty of people willing to be guinea pigs for the right price and last I checked I have not received any money so I do not intend to be their lab rat that is absurd.  

 


What do you think?

Enter Your Reply

 
 

    Notify me of follow-up comments via email